Hello,
This is maybe a kind of other point of view.
I believe that the mission for the chaptors is to support free media.. But
with keeping logo's protected under all right reserved that aren't giving
a good example.
I can understand that the official Wikimedia logos aren't free. But a logo
for pikiwiki for example can easy be released under cc-by or cc-by-sa and
that would also give a example for other company's how they should license
there logo's and photo's.
cc license can be used on Commons without problems.. But how can a
organisation support free media and upload there own material under a non
free license..
Huib
Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor
msn: Abigor@forgotten-beauty.com
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l