On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Dror Kamir <dqamir(a)bezeqint.net> wrote:
This discussion was probably discussed before. It has
to be discussed
again. I would like the members of this list to express their opinion
about the following:
Why it has to be discussed again if it' has been discussed before?
Should we rediscuss everything that has been discussed before?
Perhaps you would like to argument why a rediscussion is necessary at this
point.