On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Krinkle <krinklemail(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Making it specific to the idea of a "viewer" (e.g. "no-viewer",
"viewer-exclude", or "for-page-only") is better in my opinion, but
only
marginally so. I'd recommend aiming for something that reflects what it is
and
allows separation of concerns. Then have MMV use that in its filters. This
may
mean we'll need two instead of one if the types of images in this category
are
that different, but that would imho be a good thing.
We would like to wrap this issue up soon; using a "noviewer" class seems to
be the best proposal so far. I do agree with you in theory, and I would be
happy to use more semantic class names if someone proposed good ones, but I
don't have any idea myself what they should be.