And also why free content is preferred to be on
Commons in the first
place.
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:27:39 +0200, "Derbeth" <derbeth(a)wp.pl> said:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:22:49 +0200, Erik Moeller
wrote:
Secondly,
current version of the tool does a plagiarism - beacause it does not mention
image authors and does not provide any mean (like by making images clickable) to check
these authors.
Ouch, thanks for pointing that out. Tricky to do this automatically
since it's all wiki-text with templates, but we'll investigate a
solution here.
Fortunately most images on Commons use {{Information}} template; in other
cases it would be quite reasonable to simply assume, that names from
links to User: namespace in image description are names of the authors.
That's a good example why it's so important to follow standards on
Commons.
--
http://pl.wikipedia.org - otwarta encyklopedia
http://pl.wikinews.org - otwarte źródło informacji
http://pl.wikibooks.org - otwarte podręczniki
Opera - the fastest browser on Earth!
_______________________________________________
Textbook-l mailing list
Textbook-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l --
Mike.lifeguard
mikelifeguard(a)fastmail.fm
_______________________________________________
Textbook-l mailing list
Textbook-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org