Brion, agreed. I'd love to see a total overhaul of the ref section, I know
Kaity had started thinking about it at one point. maybe she'd be interested
in spending an Explore day sometime soon sketching some ideas.
a lightbox or fixed bottom element might be a cool way to handle seeing
them on page, although some of the ref sections can get monstrous and might
not fit that formfactor.
*Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation
M : +1 415 609 4043 | : @JaredZimmerman<https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Brion Vibber <bvibber(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I would strongly consider totally redoing how
references are displayed to
use a popup light box with citation cut n paste tools.
No caret or arrow needed for return in this situation... :)
-- brion
On Nov 12, 2013 12:22 PM, "Quiddity" <pandiculation(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Most Wikimedia sites use the mediawiki default of
an Arrow ↑ to backlink
from citation-contents to the superscripted number/letter.
English Wikipedia changed the default in 2006, to use a caret ^ and a few
dozen other wikis have copied that.
We'd like to examine the problems with the Arrow, to see if they can be
fixed.
We need help browser-testing and diagnosing and fixing the problem(s).
This may have strong relevancy to the Typography Update in Beta Features.
I've tried to summarize everything so far, at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_talk:Cite_messages#
Testing_and_summary_so_far
Thanks!
Quiddity
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design