Arun, thanks for your enthusiasm on this :). If you've got any ideas,
suggestions or comments, the Talk page on
Mediawiki.org for the Micro
Design Improvements project is probably the best place to put them.
Alternately you *can* go directly to me, but I'd prefer to have ideas
discussed publicly whenever possible: as you note, it's hard for remote
contractors to get involved in discussions, and I see greater transparency
as a way of making this easier :). I'm a remote worker myself. I'll be
encouraging people to use the
MW.org pages as more than just an etherpad or
features spec: it's a good venue to publicly have the discussions about
what we're including, why we're including it and what we've got coming up.
Thanks!
From: Vibha Bamba <vbamba(a)wikimedia.org>
Date: Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Design] Remote participation in ongoing design projects
To: "A list for the design team." <design(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Hi Arun,
MDI is something I started because there is a lot of small low hanging
fruit that we can try to address with with the community (Like you
stated)
Its also bits and pieces that may never be roadmap priorities because
they are too small.
I believe they can cumulatively contribute to a better UX.
Please feel free to log your ideas on the wiki and connect with
Oliver. Oliver is the community liason on this project.
We are testing the waters with one starter project to see how
implementation might pan out and if this approach will fly.
Thanks
Vibha
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Arun Ganesh <arun.planemad(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
As a contractor working on UX improvement, I realize there is a lot of
work that
the wmf design team is upto which I can involve myself with. I'm
particularly interested in the low hanging fruits [1] where I think a lot
of the random ideas I have can fit in. Being remote however means that it
is not always easy to attend design discussion meetings and am cut off from
any offline conversation that takes place when the lid is down.
In the interest of me and other remote participants interested in
providing
feedback to critical wmf design projects, what would be the
recommended channel to keep an eye on to follow the activity on different
projects? I would think mediawiki is where all documentation should be
eventually consolidated, but in reality is not updated often enough to be
of much use.
Hopefully i'm not missing the party somewhere where i've not looked, in
which case you should toss me in the pool :)
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation