Why not simply using the community logo ?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wikimedia_Community_Logo.svg
That was exactly what it was made for
ant
Martin Peeks wrote:
Good afternoon,
Guillaume Paumier wrote:
Hi,
"Note that no derivative of the Wikimedia logo can be published without prior approval from the Foundation."
That's the understanding I've always had, and I do try to steer clear of that logo for any purpose.
Again, I don't understand why Comproj (an informal unofficial group of users) wants to look like an official branch of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Although I think that a logo can be justified on the basis of it giving us a visual identity, I agree with Guillaume that using the official wmf-logo might not be appropriate. Perhaps any logo should be more focused towards communication - pending its licencing (which I don't want to check right now!), the "communications kite" shown on the Contact Us pages on many projects seems to be a good substitute.
Thanks,
Martin.
ComProj mailing list ComProj@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj