I too dislike the idea of having to pay to contribute to a discussion about
Wikimedia Commons. I also see some irony in advice from a platform that
being generous can be described as having lost its way many years ago, yes
we can learn from the mistakes of others. As others have said collectively
we are capable of amazing things, we are doing something special as we look
forward we mustn't lose sight what our purpose is and our goals are.
Dont forget
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data will
have impact so much of what is spoken about wont be relevant
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 21:15, Iván Hernández Cazorla via Commons-l <
commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
On 31/10/18 13:08, Federico Leva (Nemo) via Commons-l
wrote:
Sandra Fauconnier via Commons-l, 31/10/2018
10:58:
Medium, where you can leave comments:
It's truly terrible if we're now outsourcing comments to an external
proprietary platform.
Totally agree with both of you, Federico and Fae.
I don't understand the outsourcing of comments nor the promotion from
the Wikimedia Foundation of services as Facebook.
Regards,
Iván
--
Iván Hernández Cazorla
Historiador e interesado en las humanidades digitales
Miembro de Wikimedia España
https://ivanhercaz.com |
https://keybase.io/ivanhercaz
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
GN.
Noongarpedia:
https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
WMAU:
http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
Photo Gallery:
http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
Out now: A.Gaynor, P. Newman and P. Jennings (eds.), *Never Again:
Reflections on Environmental Responsibility after Roe 8*, UWAP, 2017. Order
here
<https://uwap.uwa.edu.au/products/never-again-reflections-on-environmental-responsibility-after-roe-8>
.