I was referring more to making the spam filter smarter. But I'm surprised we
have only one listmod - I agree redundancy is a good idea.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex G [mailto:g1ggyman@gmail.com]
Sent: July 29, 2008 5:44 AM
To: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] List moderator [was some spammish message]
Yes, this is what I was referring to; that we have someone else (as
well as Tim) be a listmod in case anything pops up. I wasn't
suggesting we do thinks the wikien-l way; we're nowhere near big
enough (thankfully!) to be considering that.
Any ideas for a new listmod?
-Giggy
On 7/29/08, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2008/7/28 David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>om>:
The list is basically unmoderated, which is a
good way for it to be -
we don't want every message pre-screened, or even many of them. Even
slight active moderation, as on wikien-l, is a major pain in the
backside and a source of much angst and stupidity (I'm one of the
wikien listmods), and you really don't want that if at all avoidable.
So far I really don't think commons-l needs that.
That said, multiple listmods are always a good idea.
- d.
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l