Does anyone have a comment of substance?
Like, does this solve or at least partially address the complaints and
concerns that were raised by Wikimedians?
We live with being identified via Wikipedia, it's like being Albert
Einstein's sister.
Brianna
On 13/10/2007, Ayelie <ayelie.at.large(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/12/07, Bryan Tong Minh
<bryan.tongminh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/12/07, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)wikimedia.org >
Date: 12 Oct 2007 01:33
Subject: [Foundation-l] Creative Commons 3.01 Draft
To: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List <commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org >,
Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia
.org>
I'm just going to pass the link on for now so that other folks have a
chance to comment. :)
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7718
"Despite this intent, some — especially within the Wikipedia community
— have read this clause to mean not that"
Oh so now we are the Wikipedia community
Bryan
We seriously need to pass out more Ms to the population at large. If they'd
just look at the dratted alphabet...
"M", "NO" "P"
I guess the Wikipedia brand/name is just too widely known; and too familiar
to people, even when they do know of Wikimedia or the Foundation.
Did they get ANY feedback from Wikipedia, though? I imagine the only people
who were really concerned were us Commoners, less so people from the
encyclopedias.
--
Ayelie
~Editor at Large
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment:
http://modernthings.org/