I'm sorry this happened. I'll look into how this happened, but my understanding was that the language that was used was what was in the draft.
- Joi
On Jul 21, 2007, at 2:59 JST, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Regarding Creative Commons 3.0: I saw a draft which included the unacceptable language in December 2006. I politely pointed out the flaws in the proposed wording. Out of common courtesy I respected the confidentality of the draft, but even without that factor there was no reason for public discussion at that point.
The flawed language was not included in any of the public drafts which were released later. I thought the matter was resolved. Then the license was released with the problematic language included.
-- My Blog - http://joi.ito.com/ My Photos - http://www.flickr.com/photos/joi/ Facebook Profile - http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=505656997 LinkedIn Profile - http://www.linkedin.com/profile?key=1391