I'm sorry this happened. I'll look into how this happened, but my
understanding was that the language that was used was what was in the
draft.
- Joi
On Jul 21, 2007, at 2:59 JST, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Regarding Creative Commons 3.0: I saw a draft which
included the
unacceptable language in December 2006. I politely pointed out the
flaws in the proposed wording. Out of common courtesy I respected the
confidentality of the draft, but even without that factor there was no
reason for public discussion at that point.
The flawed language was not included in any of the public drafts which
were released later. I thought the matter was resolved. Then the
license was released with the problematic language included.
--
My Blog -
http://joi.ito.com/
My Photos -
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joi/
Facebook Profile -
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=505656997
LinkedIn Profile -
http://www.linkedin.com/profile?key=1391