On 7/20/07, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We need redundant fail safe storage etc for our images
as well. We're
failing. The solution is to stop failing, not hand over the ropes to
someone else.
Since we aren't currently doing any large scale video hosting, we
wouldn't be handing over anything.
The space we're operating in is large, and there are friends willing
to help us. These include Internet Archive, Creative Commons, Mozilla,
and others. Of course they don't agree with everything we do and vice
versa. That doesn't mean that we should be taking an isolationist
stance: we should work together when it makes sense.
What is your worst case scenario?
Our popup "(>) play in browser" system
loads a launch page off a box
with an access log. Due to java security it also fetches the video
through a proxy on the same system. We can tell if the player worked
for an IP if the same IP both fetches the launch page and completes a
media file.
Previously it worked for 81-82% of the people who clicked the play button.
I pulled yesterdays numbers and it was only 72%. Both are still
clearly a majority. :) This is in the same general range as flash
penetration, at least for flash 8+... and it's way better than before
I setup the player: about 0% could just click a theora file and play
it ;)
These are promising numbers. What I would suggest to get better numbers is
1) Add a link to an example video file to the sitenotice for a couple
of weeks (or random sample of readers);
2) Add a question "Did the video play without problems in your
browser" to the page and capture the numbers.
If we end up somewhere in the 60-70% success range I guess that's
acceptable, but I'd like this confirmed with a reasonable sample of
users and an explicit question.
--
Toward Peace, Love & Progress:
Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of
the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.