On 7/2/07, Platonides <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Magnus Manske writes:
That would have
* zero impact on performance (except a few more categories, which I
guess we can handle)
* no need to install an extension or change the software
* entirely changable/configurable by commons admins through editing
template/javascript
People may want to have it on articles too (eg. i add Human.svg on an
article and want to highlight the parts of the boddy) so it'd need to be
done with an extension (db-compatible with TaggedImages?).
But people do not always get what they want ;-)
Well, it could generate said categories as e.g. (on human.svg)
[[Category:Knee|Human.svg (box:10,10,20,20)]]
JavaScript could check for these for each image on the page. Might be
JS overkill, though.
Alternatively, it could provide an output to feed the
tags for imagemap.
Interesting. I'll think about that one.
Magnus