On 8/12/07, Florence Devouard <Anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I do not see what's wrong with this. I set up this
policy on meta a long
time ago, because I felt it is non sense to stay admin when one does not
need the tool and never come to the site. It is written in the policy
and I consider that when someone ask to become admin on a site, one
knows the policy attached to the status. In the over 2 years this has
been implemented, I read no significant complain.
I've seen some complaints. Perhaps not too many because frankly fewer
people are as interested in Meta or need it for their day-to-day work
on a Wikimedia project.
Anyone removed can also ask to be reinstated.
I note that this part seems now to be controversial on Commons. Or at
least, that it should be near automatic, and not require
reconfirmation.
I do not know why you say that users are not notified.
I was one of the
persons concerned by the deadminship on commons, and I received a
notification on my talk page. I was informed.
Notified that the policy change was up for vote. I believe the low
voting numbers show that not many people even knew it was up for
discussion. It isn't that hard to post something to this mailing
list, or to place a sitenotice or similar.
I would have no problem with policy about total inactivity. What I do
have an issue about is that it requires regular admin action, not
simply user action.
-Matt