I think we have had this accreditation conversation already, I can't
remember where (foundation-l? wikinews-l?) or when. Sorry.
The answer is very simple: For those countries where accreditation is
a legal matter (France is one of them), the Foundation, or the
chapters, cannot and will not give this accreditation.
For those countries where the whole accreditation process is more
open, then it could be imagined that the Wikinews community recognize
some people as "wiki journalists" or something.
Please remember that as soon as the organisation "endorses" any person
to contribute content to the projects, it puts itself in a "publisher"
kind of position, which we need to avoid at all costs, since the
organisation is *not* a publisher.
Delphine
On 4/23/07, Andre Engels <andreengels(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2007/4/23, Guillaume Paumier
<guillom.pom(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
Last week-end there was the first round of the French presidential election.
People from Wikimedia France have been working hard to attend meetings of
the candidates to take plenty of photos of them and other politicians or
artists supporting them. Wikimedia France has even issued a press release :
<
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CP_Couverture_%C3%A9lection>
and <
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:French_presidential_election_%28…
(browse the subcategories).
To get an official press card in France, more than 50% of your total income
must come from your activities as a journalist or photographer <
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carte_de_presse_en_France>gt;.
Photographers and reporters from Wikimedia projects can obviously not get
this precious pass. Though, an accreditation letter from an institution
(along with a professional camera and a big amount of self-confidency) can
be enough.
I know the English-language Wikinews provides such accreditations for
reporters. The French-language one doesn't. We have been forced to contact
each party and request temporary press passes for each meeting. Although we
are very proud of what we have accomplished, it would be great if we had
some accreditation letters as photographers. Should they come from Wikinews?
Commons? Dunno.
Browsing through the archives of Wikinews Water cooler, I have found this
discussion :
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Water_cooler/policy/Archive/15#Accredi…
Has there been any follow-up about this issue? If not, could we work on it?
It seems to me that the accreditation can only be done by a legal
entity, and thus the accreditor at least formally should be the
Wikimedia Foundation or its French chapter. Of course they could leave
the decision as to who to actually completely dependent on the advise
by Commons or Wikinews or whatever. For PR reasons I think it would be
good to have 'Wikipedia' written on the accreditations (along with
Wikinews and Commons, and of course the WMF) - It's much better known
than the other projects, and thus could give an air of seriousness to
the user that otherwise he would not have.
--
Andre Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
~notafish
NB. This address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.
NB. Cette adresse est utilisée pour les listes de diffusion. Tout
email personnel envoyé à cette adresse sera probablement perdu.