I have noticed that editorials are now posted regularly on the German Wikinews, at http://de.wikinews.org/ - these are basically regular pages signed by a single user. Examples:
http://de.wikinews.org/wiki/Kommentar:_Chinas_Langer_Marsch_ins_All http://de.wikinews.org/wiki/Kommentar:_Der_Bundeskanzler_bewegt_sich_mit_der...
I do think we should let the German experiment unfold for a bit, but I also think people should be aware that it is happening, due to NPOV concerns about the issue.
As an alternative to editorials, I have suggested moderated debates, whose transcripts would be edited, summarized and published on the wiki: http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Debates
I believe this model allows us - by having the topics decided by the community - to avoid the specter of the "In defense of white power" type editorial, and to present opinions from notable individuals in an NPOV manner instead.
Meanwhile, editorials in the user namespace are also being debated again on the English edition: http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Water_cooler#Wikinews_Editorials
Which solution, if any, do you think might be best?
Best,
Erik
Erik: "I do think we should let the German experiment unfold for a bit, but I also think people should be aware that it is happening, due to NPOV concerns about the issue."
I have to strongly disagree with allowing this experiment to continue since it is setting a precedent that the Wikimedia NPOV mandate is optional. Editorializing non-collaborative POV content on a Wikimedia-hosted project's main namespace seems to be in violation of the approved purpose of the Wikinews project, which is to be unbiased in its content. Its non-collaborative nature also is counter-wiki.
The project is Wikinews - not Wikiblog.
-- David Speakman http://www.DavidSpeakman.com 501 Moorpark Way #83 Mountain View CA 94041 Phone: 408-382-1459
wikinews-l@lists.wikimedia.org