Le 8 avr. 05, à 13:35, shevek(a)bur.st a écrit :
Quoting "jacques.divol"
<jacques.divol(a)laposte.net>et>:
<snip>
Anyway, you can't, as standard user, trash or
completly undo article
into wiki. (except if you are a Power Being, i am not :)
I am not worried about what users may do to stories, I am worried
about what the
next person to read the story might believe after someone may do
something.
Sure, the something may be fixed up quickly, but mr or ms naive may
read the
story in the meantime.
A simple addition to the page template would give them all the
information they
need to put our site into it's correct context.
Anyway, i think that your source ask for MORE
security, fiability and
quality on wikinews than in Real Reality newspapers, don't he/she ?
(ok, it's the goal but need time and willing peoples)
No, my source simply wants to know if people can alter the story willy
nilly
after I quote them. I will have to reply yes, they can, but I would
like to be
able to say 'but our readers are warned of this'.
Right now, I can say that our readers may know it, they probably will,
but they
may not.
it's my POV ... :)
Thankyou for it. I hope I will hear more of them ;)
Jacques,with a twisted humour sense for a very
serious case.
Simeon
hi, me again sorry..
Naive people,
but also :
kids,
simple minded people
low education people,
low english/French level (foreigners,...)
Amish (science fiction ok, it's just to point)
the list is infinite I think.
Everyone is able to misunderstood Knowledge for any possible reason.
In the past, and still in some countries Knowledge is reserved to
"accredited" people or scolars.
Do you want that ?