I've always thought public domain was unworkable.
There is a problem with CC-BY - in that derivative works may have to include
the names of all people who worked on the piece - unless the contributor
agreement is worded correctly.
--
David Speakman
-----Original Message-----
From: wikinews-l-bounces(a)Wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikinews-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Amgine
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 8:35 PM
To: Wikinews mailing list
Subject: Re: [Wikinews-l] CC Licensing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The consensus of users I have spoken with on English Wikinews
about the license is to accept CC-by or any other licensing
and to move on this issue rapidly. And, universally, the next
words are "will this allow us to use fair use graphics?"
I agree with the license, and the clause allowing Wikimedia
Foundation to relicense at a later date. It will need to be
vetted by the legal team, and appropriate language inserted
into the site. Speedy implementation would be nice.
Amgine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCdZ/eyV5Kyv+4HMYRAoCQAKDA/xV9/JavutQ0Uz7bWYI9C+t2mQCfQdT4
+wWTNO8G83exEJRnwO2yPAk=
=JMsS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Wikinews-l mailing list
Wikinews-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l