Why though? Then what purpose does it serve to have changed WP to
CC-BY-SA if it still prevents copying from WP to WN or the likes? In
that sense, it really makes no logical sense. I thought the goal was to
make the WP license more compatible with other project licenses? If so
then changing it to CC-BY-SA isn't doing that at all (aside from commons).
--
Jason Safoutin
Wikinews accredited reporter and administrator
jason.safoutin@wikinewsie.org
Paul Williams wrote:
> 2009/5/30 Jason Safoutin <jason.safoutin@wikinewsie.org
>
mailto:jason.safoutin@wikinewsie.org>
>
> Why could we not copy from WP? SA is just the basic same as regular CC
> BY. If copying from WP will still not be allowed, then why did they go
> through the trouble to even change the license if its still not
> compatible with other projects?
>
>
> CC-BY is not the same as CC-BY-SA - we (Wikinews) must publish our
> content under CC-BY-SA if we wish to copy from WP.
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Williams
> paul@skenmy.com
mailto:paul@skenmy.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikinews-l mailing list
> Wikinews-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
>
--
Jason Safoutin
Wikinews accredited reporter and administrator
jason.safoutin@wikinewsie.org