Why though? Then what purpose does it serve to have changed WP to
CC-BY-SA if it still prevents copying from WP to WN or the likes? In
that sense, it really makes no logical sense. I thought the goal was to
make the WP license more compatible with other project licenses? If so
then changing it to CC-BY-SA isn't doing that at all (aside from commons).
--
Jason Safoutin
Wikinews accredited reporter and administrator
jason.safoutin(a)wikinewsie.org
Paul Williams wrote:
2009/5/30 Jason Safoutin
<jason.safoutin(a)wikinewsie.org
<mailto:jason.safoutin@wikinewsie.org>>
Why could we not copy from WP? SA is just the basic same as regular CC
BY. If copying from WP will still not be allowed, then why did they go
through the trouble to even change the license if its still not
compatible with other projects?
CC-BY is not the same as CC-BY-SA - we (Wikinews) must publish our
content under CC-BY-SA if we wish to copy from WP.
Regards,
Paul Williams
paul(a)skenmy.com <mailto:paul@skenmy.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wikinews-l mailing list
Wikinews-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
--
Jason Safoutin
Wikinews accredited reporter and administrator
jason.safoutin(a)wikinewsie.org