Karl wrote:
Why PS instead of PDF ?
PDF is one of the flagship file formats of Adobe - they allow people to create pdfs fairly freely now but they could change that at any time. So we should rely on a proprietary file format.
PS is a bit more open since its code wasn't locked down until fairly late in its development (IIRC PDF is based on PS) and a bit of an unwanted step-child since PDF came on the scene. It used to be much more common (remember "Print to file" in Windows 3.x products? Those files where .ps) but now is just the file that is sent to Post Script (PS) printers - it is hidden from users.
But then I'm working on just a vague recollection so I am probably missing something or got something really wrong.
Is there a reader for it ?
I can read it with software that comes standard in my Linux distro but Windows users haven't been able to read PS with a default install for years, IIRC. I was thinking more along the lines of actually *printing* the darn thing - if people want an electric version they can visit our website.
But there are free html->pdf converters...
It seems sometimes like the world is lacking a decent open-source word processing / printing file format.
I could hardly agree more - this is a huge omission.
--Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
Op di 29-07-2003, om 16:49 schreef Daniel Mayer:
Karl wrote:
Why PS instead of PDF ?
PDF is one of the flagship file formats of Adobe - they allow people to create pdfs fairly freely now but they could change that at any time. So we should rely on a proprietary file format.
Standard GNU/Linux have a few pdf-readers, like xpdf, kghostview, gv,ggv. KDE and OpenOffice can print to PDF. Many of these programs are GPL, so what could Adobe do about that?
Wouter
textbook-l@lists.wikimedia.org