I like that logo. I think that you should put the new

Wikipedia logo on the cover once it is chosen tomorrow.

That's a good idea!

There's nothing wrong with the organic chemistry book,

but don't you think it's a bit narcissistic to say that you have the best organic chemistry textbook on the web? I think you should change it to something like the best wiki-produced organic chemistry textbook, or aspires to be the best organic chemistry textbook on the web. There is probably a finished organic chemistry textbook on the web, sorry.

I disagree. I think you're trying to be NPOV which isn't really necessary on wikibooks. The title may be a bit grand at the moment but once it starts getting edited by a number of contributors it will soon become the best.

PS. Can you move your organic chemistry pages to the

Organic chemistry: namespace?

Have namespaces been definitely decided on as the way to go? Because I've been naming pages on GCSE science "foobar (GCSE science)".

Theresa

__________________________________