Toby wrote:

But anyway, I doubt that DPOV will ever be written up. Jimmy invented NPOV, and he says that NPOV includes what mav wants.

If anything happens, it's that [[NPOV]] will have to be clarified. But since Jimmy also keeps agreeing with my intepretations of it, I see no risk that any such clarification will threaten your book. The only alternative is that Jimmy's opinions are incoherent, but nobody is arguing that.

Yep - all I ever really wanted was to clarify NPOV to suit the needs of textbooks (to give it a new framework or focus to work in - I mistakingly called that "POV"). I was just trying to be clear by giving it a new name but Jimbo has convinced me that the needed changes are not drastic enough to warrent a new name. It will just be the "textbook's version of NPOV."

-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)