Erik Moeller schrieb:
Let's just be absolutely clear here that the content is under the GFDL, and anyone can use it commercially or in other ways if they follow the terms of the license. The only issues here are a) whether it is wise for the Wikimedia Foundation to do it at this point in time b) that the Wikimedia Foundation name was used inappropriately c) to what extent such uses should be documented on the Wikimedia projects.
Right?
I am not objecting to these three points. However, I suggest also to point out "soft criteria" which in by no way are legal requirements but rather suggestions. It boils down to: "Please tell what you are doing. Give everyone a chance to make suggestions. Be part of a community, not a sole warrior."
Mathias