On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:46:14PM -0700, Daniel Mayer wrote:
Wouter Vanden Hove wrote:
... I also would like to point out the recent Debian decision to consider the GFDL as a non-free license. This has been debated for months on debian-legal. You
can read the archives here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/
Side note: They only consider GFDLd text to be "non-free" when "Invariant Sections", "Cover Texts", "Acknowledgements", and/or "Dedications" (all GFDL options) are used. We don't use any of those so our text is free content.
That's right wrt Debian. Now that's a real shame that GFDL has such options at all - they're all plain non-free.