Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
Does the CC SA have provisions for transparent coppies? I think that that's a major difference in some people's minds (in the case of ebooks, etc). LDan
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/legalcode
Yes, it's in there, in this form:
You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological measures that control access or use of the Work in a manner inconsistent with the terms of this License Agreement. You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological measures that control access or use of the Work in a manner inconsistent with the terms of this License Agreement.
This is different in many ways from the way the GNU FDL spells it out, but in essence, it's the same thing.
That's the real problem of incompatibility that I think can only be solved through an explicit recognition of each other's licenses or clauses allowing the use of other licenses that have 'substantially similar' provisions.
--Jimbo