Magnus Manske wrote:
I would like to limit editing to logged-in people only. Now calm down, I don't try to rip the wiki principle apart.
I wouldn't be extremely opposed to this, but I think we should be very cautious about moves in this direction.
Particularly since textbooks are, by their nature, not as general as an encyclopedia, there is a smaller pool of authors *per book*, so that we need to be very careful about any barriers to participation.
Here's the thing that I want to keep reminding everyone: the whole idea of wiki is completely insane. It's obvious to me, based on everything I know about human nature, that it just can't possibly work. But... it does.
So my inclination is to discourage 'a priori problem solving', as least to a degree. Nupedia was an exercise in excessive a priori community design, and it failed miserably. But trusting people to do the right thing seems to work remarkably well.
Even so, it's entirely possible that the community dynamic for writing a textbook is very different from the community dynamic for writing an encyclopedia. So experience might teach us that radical-wiki-openness really can't work here.
Still, isn't that something that we should let experience teach us, rather than making assumptions beforehand?
--Jimbo