Karl Wick wrote:
Please show me ANY evidence that RMS and the FSF will be flexible about changing their licensing terms how we want them.
Otherwise lets get new modules released in some way that is not exclusively GNU FDL.
And then we could not use GNU FDL only text created elsewhere (like on Wikipedia). The advantages of what you want are counteracted by the disadvantages of confusing users and downstream users and locking out GNU FDL only text.
Since you own the copyright to all the work you submit, you can release versions of your text in whatever license you want. But to make things simple and easy for contributors and downstream users, we should only have one license for all Wikimedia projects.
-- mav