Good point on the religious books, there is a fine line between POV and NPOV that I don't think many people follow when it comes to their faith. After all, a person wouldn't be a member of a particular religion if they didnt think that religion was the "undisputable truth". I've been watching those books you mention reasonably closely, and while I think there are a few NPOV and cleanup issues here and there, I dont think either book is exactly in need of deletion.
There is a difference in saying what a particular group believes, and what people ''should'' believe. So long as they stay with the first option, they can be on wikibooks.
--Whiteknight
What do you think of http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Christianity/Living_as_a_Christian and http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Imamat_or_Successorship_After_the_Last_Prophet_...
I noticed there are more and more users who contribute to books that are made with strongly islamic point of view (we already have some texts about islam: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Category:Islam), with nicks like "Truebeliever", "Believer" etc. I'm afraid that we might attract some zealots who see us as a good place to develop propaganda. Generally, I think that we should think how we should treat books about religious topics.
-- Piotr 'Derbeth' Kubowicz Jabber id: derbeth@jabber.wp.pl
Pomó¿ Wikibooks stworzyæ najwiêkszy zbiór otwartych podrêczników! http://pl.wikibooks.org/
Opera - the fastest browser on Earth! http://www.opera.com/ _______________________________________________ Textbook-l mailing list Textbook-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l