Friends, Family, USU IT Faculty, Grad Students & Alumni,
It's only in its infancy (pre-conception, you might even say), but I wanted
to let you all know about a project that I've started to think about, under
the guidance/tutelage of Dr. Wiley here at USU.
It is currently called the "Utah OpenTextbooks Project" (codenamed "Project
Dyson" by Dr. Wiley)--and I am considering doing my dissertation around it.
The basic gist is as follows:
The state of Utah, and other states like it, spend over $20M annually on
K-12 textbooks. With that kind of money, and with shrinking educational
budgets, a few questions are worth asking:
* Are these textbooks worth the $$$? Also, does a brand new U.S. History or
Algebra 1 textbook need to be repurchased every few years (at full cost) for
whatever few changes may be made?
* Do we want a handful of states (New York, California, Florida, Texas)
driving the content of textbooks in all the other states (which is basically
what happens today, as I¹m told)?
* Could better, more innovate textbooks be developed in a
community/open/wiki style (see http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page and
www.opensourcetext.org for starters), where the COMMUNITY would retain
ownership of the contentor better yet, share w/ other states/countries?
* Once a textbook has been written by a community, could digital learning
objects be built around the text/course and provided as supplements to the
textbookhelping teachers teach better, and learners learn better (think
free multimedia clips for lectures, test banks and innovate lesson plans for
teachers, or cool multimedia games/self-direct modules for student homework,
etc.)
* Finally, if we can create ³local² (statewide) online communities where
teachers, students, and subject matter experts congregate to create
textbooks, share lesson plans, and basically socialize in the context of an
academic course...can we harness the power of the internet in more positive
ways...to far more productive ends (think ³replace MTV or Xbox with Utah
Math Rocks Internet Plaza¹²?
I have attached a very, very rough "Vision Document" that outlines what we
have brainstormed, and some early, high-level steps on how we might go about
achieving our vision. If you are not comfortable opening attachments from
an email (can¹t imagine why you would be :) ), feel free to download the
document from:
http://f4.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/oL1RQdNHDrnawcLP1c-av2v_Y1LRpZ_PL_4Paj7XwHCX0b_
09Ppay-jJ0791jStsb2IgwQl1VSP0Rf6L3jpxxg/Utah%20OpenTextbooks%20Project.doc
We need lots of input/ideas/feedback, so if any of you are interested in
participating in/supporting this project in any way (even as a silent
observer), please feel free to reply w/ feedback, or even join our community
at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/utahopentextbooks
Also, if you know anyone interested in Utah Education, or Open Textbooks,
please feel free to forward this message to them.
I look forward to collaborating w/ those of you who are interested. It will
be a long journey to be sure, but hopefully a worthwhile one.
John Dehlin
Director of Outreach
OSLO Research Group
http://oslo.usu.edu/people/jdehlin
Utah State University
Alfred,
This is great feedback, and I very much look forward to chatting w/ you
about this. Sincerely. I will be in contact w/ you soon.
TO EVERYONE ELSE ON THIS THREADI¹M VERY SORRY FOR THE SPAM....AND IF ANY OF
YOU WANT TO CONTINUE THIS DISCUSSION, PLEASE REPLY TO ME DIRECTLY TO AVOID
MORE SPAM TO OTHERS ON THE LIST.
Thanks and sorry.
John
On 9/23/04 8:30 AM, "Alfred Jole" <ajole(a)dcsd.org> wrote:
> As a high school teacher, I have a few things to say on the subject of
> textbooks.
> Oh, and please note, I am not in favor or against the project, I just wanted
> to get in the discussion and get some real classroom input out there. I think
> it would be a really good thing to think about, or to wrap a dissertation
> around. Good luck!
>
> ³does a brand new U.S. History or Algebra 1 textbook need to be repurchased
> every few years (at full cost) for whatever few changes may be made?²
> We don¹t replace texts because of new editions, we replace them because they
> get worn out. Amazing what a teenager can do to a backpack full of books.
>
> ³could digital learning objects be built around the text/course and provided
> as supplements to the textbook²
> Yes, but we couldn¹t get those out to the kids without a LOT more investment
> in technology. I¹d guess it would cost more per year to ensure every teacher
> had the projectors and computers and smart boards necessary; as well as to
> ensure that every kid had access to their own work station, than it costs to
> give em books. Just an educated guess though, good question for some research
> there. Maybe a PDA version of a textbook; they are very much in line with
> textbook costs right now, and would be easier to carry (and lose, but what are
> ya gonna do?). Also in that discussion we need to look at all the training and
> tech support costs that often seem to get overlooked.
>
>
> ³Could better, more innovate textbooks be developed in a community/open/wiki
> style²
> Maybe, but what do you do with the community that is too small, or simply
> doesn¹t have the resources to handle it? Admittedly they could share in what
> is out there, but how is that different from what we have now?
> Also, since our core classes are so terribly test-driven now, (thanks to NCLB
> and UBSCT), we need to teach what is on the standardized tests, and that is
> already in the textbooks we choose; probably because the best tests seem to
> come from the same places as the texts. In fact, when Utah tried to write the
> UBSCT, we had a terrible time with it; which opens up a whole new discussion:
> What about competency? How do you measure it if everyone gets to set their
> own content?.
>
> Perhaps the answer is in there somewhere, but it would take a change in the
> entire fabric of how we do school in America. Which could be a good thing.
> There are more ideas running around in my head, but I have to go teach Algebra
> now.
> Thanks, and let the rumble begin!
>
>
> Al Jole
>
>
> From: instgrad-bounces(a)it.usu.edu [mailto:instgrad-bounces@it.usu.edu] On
> Behalf Of John Dehlin
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 1:43 PM
> To: David Dehlin; Juli Faust; Nan McCulloch; John & Gina Faust; Joel Dehlin;
> Ronald Fuller; Frank Fox; Frank Gorgenyi; Cindy Ingersoll; Ted Lyon; Lynn
> England; William Bradshaw; Clayton White; Eric Ringger; Paul Mayfield; Pete
> Gehrett; Bryn and Marita Lane; Steven Kent; Polly Taylor; Benson Parkinson;
> Dilworth & LB Parkinson; Jim & Sue Parkinson; Mark Parkinson; Ricky & Mavis
> Parkinson; Sam Parkinson; ldstt(a)yahoogroups.com; John Anderson; Stephen
> Wesson; Paul LeFrere; Geoff Thatcher; Eric Jarvi; Dave Willman; Jessica
> Friesen; Harvey Hughes; Mark Adams; Mark & Teri; Mark Nelson; Mark Berndt;
> Karl Quilter; Spencer Scott; Catherine Scott; Jonathan Weber; Shawn Jones;
> Maury Giles; Margi Dehlin; David Benson; David Taylor; Russ Watterson; Nick
> Eastmond; brett.shelton(a)usu.edu; yanghee; Byron Burnham; Gwen Baird; Mimi
> Recker; Joanne Bentley; Instagrad; John Dehlin; stephen(a)downes.ca;
> ldsmbrs(a)microsoft.com; ldsshado(a)microsoft.com; curtc(a)microsoft.com; Matt
> Brinton; Dan Peay; cslemp(a)microsoft.com; judih(a)microsoft.com; Lary Cullimore;
> chrisb(a)microsoft.com; Mary Bradford; Maury Giles; tomjones(a)microsoft.com;
> chasf(a)microsoft.com; todd.garner(a)crbard.com; dmahlum(a)microsoft.com;
> jasonkap(a)hotmail.com; john.b.thorpe(a)smithbarney.com; reedp(a)microsoft.com;
> davjohn(a)microsoft.com; skindmore(a)aiken.com; jeff Skidmore; Mark Adams;
> raulj(a)microsoft.com; mattsmit(a)microsoft.com; Afif Say; Afif Say;
> jkap(a)microsoft.com; David Wiley; Tom and Julie Hatton; Arthur Hatton; Sanford
> Forte; textbook-l(a)wikimedia.org; beesley(a)gmail.com; soziologie(a)t-online.de;
> Eric Ringger
> Subject: [Instgrad] Utah OpenTexbooks Project (Project Dyson)
>
> Friends, Family, USU IT Faculty, Grad Students & Alumni,
>
> It's only in its infancy (pre-conception, you might even say), but I wanted to
> let you all know about a project that I've started to think about, under the
> guidance/tutelage of Dr. Wiley here at USU.
>
> It is currently called the "Utah OpenTextbooks Project" (codenamed "Project
> Dyson" by Dr. Wiley)--and I am considering doing my dissertation around it.
> The basic gist is as follows:
>
> The state of Utah, and other states like it, spend over $20M annually on K-12
> textbooks. With that kind of money, and with shrinking educational budgets, a
> few questions are worth asking:
> * Are these textbooks worth the $$$? Also, does a brand new U.S. History or
> Algebra 1 textbook need to be repurchased every few years (at full cost) for
> whatever few changes may be made?
> * Do we want a handful of states (New York, California, Florida, Texas)
> driving the content of textbooks in all the other states (which is basically
> what happens today, as I¹m told)?
> * Could better, more innovate textbooks be developed in a community/open/wiki
> style (see http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page and www.opensourcetext.org
> for starters), where the COMMUNITY would retain ownership of the contentor
> better yet, share w/ other states/countries?
> * Once a textbook has been written by a community, could digital learning
> objects be built around the text/course and provided as supplements to the
> textbookhelping teachers teach better, and learners learn better (think free
> multimedia clips for lectures, test banks and innovate lesson plans for
> teachers, or cool multimedia games/self-direct modules for student homework,
> etc.)
> * Finally, if we can create ³local² (statewide) online communities where
> teachers, students, and subject matter experts congregate to create textbooks,
> share lesson plans, and basically socialize in the context of an academic
> course...can we harness the power of the internet in more positive ways...to
> far more productive ends (think ³replace MTV or Xbox with Utah Math Rocks
> Internet Plaza¹²?
>
> I have attached a very, very rough "Vision Document" that outlines what we
> have brainstormed, and some early, high-level steps on how we might go about
> achieving our vision. If you are not comfortable opening attachments from an
> email (can¹t imagine why you would be :) ), feel free to download the document
> from:
> http://f4.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/oL1RQdNHDrnawcLP1c-av2v_Y1LRpZ_PL_4Paj7XwHCX0b…
> Ppay-jJ0791jStsb2IgwQl1VSP0Rf6L3jpxxg/Utah%20OpenTextbooks%20Project.doc
>
> We need lots of input/ideas/feedback, so if any of you are interested in
> participating in/supporting this project in any way (even as a silent
> observer), please feel free to reply w/ feedback, or even join our community
> at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/utahopentextbooks
>
> Also, if you know anyone interested in Utah Education, or Open Textbooks,
> please feel free to forward this message to them.
>
> I look forward to collaborating w/ those of you who are interested. It will
> be a long journey to be sure, but hopefully a worthwhile one.
>
> John Dehlin
> Director of Outreach
> OSLO Research Group
> http://oslo.usu.edu/people/jdehlin
> Utah State University
>
I am new to this group, but am super duper interested
in supporting the "movement".
Would someone be kind enough to give me an update as
to the "State of the Union" for Open Wiki Textbooks?
I would love to know things like:
-- How many people are engaged?
-- Is the movement growing, or shrinking?
-- Are any Wiki textbooks "completed"? If so, how
many?
-- Is there any record of any school or school
district anywhere in the U.S. that has agreed to use a
Wiki Textbook for official classes?
-- Is there another forum or alias or group where the
dialog is more active/involved?
-- Are there other open textbook initiatives outside
of this one that I should be aware of?
I can't wait to learn more!
John
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com