Exactly; we give a list of revision_ids, with the probability that each is vandalized, and also, with their date. The date is important, as sometimes you want to check manually that revisions that are too old are rendered properly (no broken templates). I don't think Martin ran into this problem, but we provide this information in any case.
We are working hard to complete this procedure, however, we topped with some drawbacks such as the importance categorization process that is nonexistent in the Spanish version. It would be interesting to find a more automated.
The screening tool is excellent and we will facilitate the review process of articles. There is little human action, however, we have a strong will to carry out this process.
The approach selected is similar to that of WP 1.0 in English, however, can not use the same list of items for cultural differences (different languages belong to different persons, places, countries, sentatives, etc..), but , there may be many similarities.