Offline-l

offline-l@lists.wikimedia.org

7 participants
692 discussions

Rebranding: please give your opinion NOW
by Florence Devouard 01 Jul '20

01 Jul '20

Hello all Sj and I have discussed and decided the following. 1) We have decided that the offline wikimedians UG will not answer the WMF survey. Main argument is purely technical. Due to the complex design of the survey, we consider it too difficult to collect your collective opinions and draw relevant conclusions to inject into the survey. We could have made it simpler is filling a survey that would reflect Sj and I opinion, but we did not feel we should do that. So, if you want to provide your opinion and answer the WMF survey, please do so at the individual level (we strongly suggest you do) ---> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… 2) With regards to signing the COOL (Community Open Letter on renaming), we would like to ask you to please vote by saying : either "Yes, we should sign the letter" or "No, we should not sign the letter" Neutral opinion will be counted as No If we have at least 7 members voting and at least 2/3 YES, we will sign the letter. If we have at least 7 members voting and less than 2/3 YES, we will not sign the letter. If we have less than 7 members voting, we will not sign the letter. Please vote by answering to this email (public statement) Deadline Wenesday Link to the letter : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_open_letter_on_renaming At the moment, 34 affiliates signed it (and 335 individuals) Flo and Sj

6 7

Re: [Offline-l] Offline-l Digest, Vol 100, Issue 11
by Michael Graaf 28 Jun '20

28 Jun '20

I support signing COOL! On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 2:00 PM <offline-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org> wrote: > Send Offline-l mailing list submissions to > offline-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/offline-l > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > offline-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > offline-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Offline-l digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Rebranding: please give your opinion NOW (Florence Devouard) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:59:28 +0200 > From: Florence Devouard <anthere(a)anthere.org> > To: Using Wikimedia projects and MediaWiki offline > <offline-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: [Offline-l] Rebranding: please give your opinion NOW > Message-ID: <7275054a-ad0a-708e-fcbe-e08788db305f(a)anthere.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Hello all > > > Sj and I have discussed and decided the following. > > > 1) We have decided that the offline wikimedians UG will not answer the > WMF survey. > Main argument is purely technical. Due to the complex design of the > survey, we consider it too difficult to collect your collective opinions > and draw relevant conclusions to inject into the survey. > We could have made it simpler is filling a survey that would reflect Sj > and I opinion, but we did not feel we should do that. > So, if you want to provide your opinion and answer the WMF survey, > please do so at the individual level (we strongly suggest you do) > ---> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… > > > 2) With regards to signing the COOL (Community Open Letter on renaming), > we would like to ask you to please vote by saying : > > either "Yes, we should sign the letter" > or "No, we should not sign the letter" > > Neutral opinion will be counted as No > > > If we have at least 7 members voting and at least 2/3 YES, we will sign > the letter. > If we have at least 7 members voting and less than 2/3 YES, we will not > sign the letter. > If we have less than 7 members voting, we will not sign the letter. > > Please vote by answering to this email (public statement) > Deadline Wenesday > > Link to the letter : > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_open_letter_on_renaming > At the moment, 34 affiliates signed it (and 335 individuals) > > Flo and Sj > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Offline-l mailing list > Offline-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/offline-l > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Offline-l Digest, Vol 100, Issue 11 > ****************************************** > -- Michael Graaf, M.I.T.(UCT) Researcher, Editor & Community Informatics Practitioner Mob +27795487242 WhatsApp +27647754342 ORCID 0000-0002-1951-5739

1 0

[AAR] Interesting online/offline use case across West Africa
by Stephane Coillet-Matillon 24 Jun '20

24 Jun '20

Hello everyone, We might as well keep this list rolling - it’s been an eventful couple of months and there’s plenty to tell. Just as COVID-19 lockdowns started to roll out across much of the world, our good friends at Orange (the French Telco) reached out asking for us to roll out Kiwix directly onto their West African network. So yes, here’s the short story of us making offline available online (!) Background In a nutshell, it’s easier/faster for a telco to carry data on its own, local network than it is to carry that same amount of data internationally. It does make sense in hindsight, particularly if you think of the internets as a series of tube. Mission They asked that we roll out Kiwix and a collection of ZIMs in Arabic, French and English onto their Ivory Coast hub: Orange customers were to be directed to a specific page[1] and would be offered the content at zero-rating or special low rate (markets could chose their pricing model). 11 markets were selected for the operation (mostly sub-saharan Africa). We rolled-out the whole thing in a few days using Kiwix-serve[2] - most of the time needed was for them to secure a big-ass server and grant us root access. It’s been running smoothly ever since - up to 100,000 users/month at peak, which was nice. Contents deployed were Wikipedia, Khan Academy, Wiktionary, Vikidia and a couple of video channels we also serve as ZIMs. So what did we learn? - Kiwix-serve is super easy to install, and can manage large loads robustly; - Most demanded contents: Wikipedia and Khan Academy, then Wiktionary & Gutenberg library; - Information circulated around somehow: we’ve had users from 130 countries so far (about 20-30% of total traffic), definitely not bots. A gentleman from An-Najah university in Palestine even reached out asking that we deploy the same thing on their local network. - The URL that Orange set up was overly long, which probably impacted adoption. We lobbied to get https://kiwix.orange (they own the TLD) but to no avail :-/ There is also a huge difference between markets that communicated on the initiative in a sustained manner (e.g. Liberia) and those who did it as a one-off. Cookie points They made a simple but sweet video[3] - in French only but you’ll get the idea. [1] https://kiwix.campusafrica.gos.orange.com/ <https://kiwix.campusafrica.gos.orange.com/> [2] https://github.com/kiwix/kiwix-tools <https://github.com/kiwix/kiwix-tools> [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ug0XEFhByc <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ug0XEFhByc>

2 1

[KIWIX] Our openZIM farm...
by Emmanuel Engelhart 24 Jun '20

24 Jun '20

Hi There is a topic I wanted to talk about here for a long time and for which I never have achieved to take the time to write something. A few recent events have been a healthy remember that I should present one our most recent and most useful tool: Zimfarm. The Zimfarm is the online tool which is in charge of building and publishing all our ZIM files. After years of creating ZIM files by launching scrapers more or less manually, we had to automatise the process to just be able to scale the operations, ie. publishing more and more often ZIM files. The effort started 3 years ago with the support of the WMF but we use it only since Spring 2019 in production. The tool is now perfectly running and we fully rely on it now. If we can publish an update of all our wikis one time a month, this is thanks to this piece of software too. The Zimfarm is a half-decentralized solution which has a central node (called "dispatcher") in charge of orchestrating the work to do and multiple decentralized nodes (called "workers") which run the scraping tasks. The dispatcher provides an API to manage the ZIM recipes and tasks, have a look to https://api.farm.openzim.org/. We have setup a Web frontend on this API to allow easy mgmt through a Web browser. For a better transparency, even anonymous users can have a look and monitor what is going on. Look at https://farm.openzim.org/. One important point is that, like all the rest of our infrastructure, the whole system is Dockerized. Which means, this is really easy to install a Zimfarm worker and we invite anybody having a spare server to help us to provide offline snapshots of the best of the Web. The procedure is documented and a few volunteers have already joined in. Look at https://farm.openzim.org/about for more details. The development is fully transparent at https://github.com/openzim/zimfarm. We have a few things which are on the roadmap which would welcome volunteer Python developers. Look at the good first issues and make your first PR! https://github.com/openzim/zimfarm/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%2… Regards Emmanuel -- Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline & more * Web: https://kiwix.org/ * Twitter: https://twitter.com/KiwixOffline * Wiki: https://wiki.kiwix.org/

2 2

Fwd: Re: Wikimedia Brand Survey
by Florence Devouard 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

_*New elements*_ 1. The online meetings planned last week-end to discuss how to move forward with regards to the survey were successfully held. Essie (WMF staff in charge of collecting the survey) attended the first part of the meeting to answer questions participants could have Second part of the meeting was "without WMF staff". Long discussions etc. Main point is that a team (Andrew Lih, Phoebe an Richard) *proposed to write a Letter to the Board*. A draft was produced and will be made public tomorrow (I will share the link, it is currently still private, but Sj and I have access to current version). *Essentially this Letter asks for a "pause" in the process to allow further discussions.* Keep in mind that when the meeting was held, the deadline to answer the survey was June 30th This letter will be proposed tomorrow for signature for Affiliates. <------ will have to be discussed from tomorrow on after link publicly published. 2. In the meanwhile, *the board issued a statement*. That you can read here : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/Boar… Summary and key points - it was published by Nataliia, and though a "board statement", mostly read in the "I'. Apparently due to the urgency of the situation and not all board members being available over the week-end. - outline that, contrariwise to what Heather said in the exec statement, the final decision has not been made yet. Likely to be made in August 2020 during the next board meeting - and note that no decision has been made regarding the naming of the affiliates - Natalia mentions the future Wikipedia 20th Anniversary and the former wish of the Board to get everything fixed before that date (which actually came a bit oddly in the discussion because very few community members discussed that in relation to the rebranding process) 3. This morning, Samir sent us an email and said t*he deadline to answer the survey is extended till July 7th*. He also says There are 3 office hours this weekwhere the Brand Project Team will continue to answer questions. All links available here in the news section : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… If you are interested in joining and asking questions, this is the right time to do it. If you are short of time and/or already made it your time ---> drop 4. *There is a community feedback and straw poll* here *In light of recent events, including the publication of survey text and naming proposals, it may benefit the WMF to see how the community feels about certain naming-related issues, transparently and on-wiki. Therefore, the poll. This is an informal poll, and does not replace theWMF survey. At least, the results of this one are publicly visible ;)* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… ----------- _*My personal take on this is*_ * that the board already decided a LONG time ago to rename Wikimedia Foundation into Wikipedia something; and that they will do that, no matter what. * that the two communication/brand companies were only hired to facilitate the process, and take the heat, being blamed for failing to provide good suggestions or supposingly pushing the board to adopt a new name. Whatever, they are just the safety valve. They will not take all the heat, but part of it making the pill easier to go down the throat of the community * that the process is being "pushed" with a feeling of urgency, which surprises many because usually we benefit from longer timeframe and covid19 oblige, everything is slowed. But the truth is... the main benefit of the renaming is likely to be financial, with an easier and better way to fundraise. With the current crisis, it is likely the future fundraising season will be bad. Fundraising season start around September. So the name change should benefit to be done before this year fundraising season. Additionnaly, the Wikipedia 20th birthday could be an excellent communication opportunity to promote the new name of the WMF. Hence the urgency and the unlikeliness that the process significantly slows down * in comparison, the renaming (or not) of affiliates is perceived as non urgent and non essential, which is quite logical in the WMF perspective. So it is possible to cut some slack here to cool down spirits * Natalia is possibly being the other sacrificed piece in the process. ---------- _*Your suggested todo list*_ 1) Quickly read this page : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… 2) read the executive statement if you have not done so. Always interesting: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… 3) read the board statement. Always interesting. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/Boar… 4) reflect on the implications of the WMF rename on your own activities and structure 5) decide whether you will answer the *individual survey* (before July 07th) : https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9G2dN7P0T7gPqpD 6) decide whether you want to take the *community poll *: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… 7) tomorrow, read the open letter when I sent the link, and tell Sj and I whether you think the Offline UG should sign it or not 8) tell Sj and I if you have a strong opinion on what we should answer in the *Affiliate Survey* Flo Le 21/06/2020 à 19:40, Florence Devouard a écrit : > > It is a fair question Emmanuel > > > Well, what you say is true. In short, if I summarize super briefly > > 1) According to Heather, the brand redefinition was a request from the > board back in 2015. But there is no mention in board meeting minutes > and two former board members do not remember this decision. Note: this > was in Lila time. > However, it seems indeed that the board confirmed its non-opposition > to the communication team to work on that topic in 2018: > https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Minutes/2018-11-9,10,11#Branding > Note that this does not appear to be a request from the board to the > staff, but rather a request from the staff to be allowed to explore. > > 2) Brand awareness survey done in 7 countries in 2017 showed poor > visibility and understanding of the wikimedia brand > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Sources/Br… > > 2) When a survey was done a bit later, the statistical results were > displayed in such a way that the case was made from the brand team > that there was very little opposition from the community > https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Communications%2FWikimedia_bra… > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_… > Evidence was made that the statistical presentation was broken and > misleading. > Arguments from opponents to the change include the fact the board > members might have been mislead in believing there was no opposition > from the community, and thus approved a rebranding without correct > context. > > 3) Following that situation, a RFC was launched by the community, and > show an overwelming opposition to replace Wikimedia with Wikipedia in > our orgs and projects name. > Note that RFC is opt-in only, so might over represent those who oppose > the rebranding. Hence the case made for the final survey to poll > community members about their position on the matter. > Those who want to further explore: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_… > > 4) The Brand team continued its work. Extensive discussions followed, > with face to face brainstorming events to try to identify "good > ideas". And key argument to opponants was that it was still in > discussion phase etc. > Brand network was created to better inform etc., give arguments in > favor of the change etc. (I joined it as representant of offline UG to > keep track of what was going on) > There was further information provided about a month ago during a > public meeting, revealing a collection of "words/directions" > There were repeated requests from the people following this topic, for > the final survey to include the "no change please" option. But this > has been dismissed repeatedly. > > 5) Then finally a new survey (the one I mentionned earlier) was > proposed a few days ago with a short list of options. The "no option" > is not proposed, and the three options include replacing wikimedia by > wikipedia. > This is creating social unrest. Best person to know more about that is > Andrew Lih. > > 6) An executive statement was published 2 days ago, stating that a) > this rebranding was done per board request, and 2) the rename will happen > Quote: *"We should have been clearer: a rebrand will happen. This has > already been decided by the Board. The place where we seek > consultation and input is on what an optimal rebrand looks like, and > what the path to get there will be."* > To read full statement : > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… > > 7) There is a boiling discussion on whether to set up a central banner > to invite participants to respond the survey, with community > opposition to set up the banner. > I have actually been contacted by some staff about this, who were > apparently trying to evaluate the level of risk of WMF staff to be > unsysoped if they decided the get over the community and activate the > banner anyway > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CentralNotice/Request/Movement_Brand_naming… > I am not sure the banner is live yet. At least, I see no banner > myself. It should have gone live on the 16th > > 8) Thus followed much discussion after the executive statement, on > telegram and on meta. > Probably central place is here : > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_m… > APPARENTLY, a statement from the board is expected. Unless wrong, it > has not been published yet. > > 9) There is a meeting TONIGHT (21h UTC+2), community organized, on the > matter. > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/All-Affiliates_Brand_Meeting > I'll attend and will try to summarize > >

2 1

Wikimedia Brand Survey
by Florence Devouard 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

Hello friends So, the Brand Team is moving on and has announced a short list of proposals to rename Wikimedia Foundation, UG and such to remove the word "Wikimedia" Yesterday, the Team presented the results of their thinking during a live youtube session. It is one hour long, but the presentation itself is less than 30 minutes. Then followed by questions. To know more about the three propositions, the page to go to : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… The Brand team also launched yesterday a new survey to measure our support to this new branding scheme. We are invited to participate to this survey in two capacities 1. as individuals 2. as affiliate And quite naturally, we can also react, discuss etc in the above mentionned talk page, on mailing lists, telegram etc. Taking the survey as individual is your own decision. Deadline June 30th However, answering as an affiliate is a slighly more complicated thing to do. So I reported that in a wiki page, where we can collect feedback from you and try to answer in the name of the group, if relevant. Roughly... if there is a general agreement... it will be easy to respond in the name of the offline UG If there is no clear agreement... we'll have to reflect on what to do But the first step in any cases is to actually record your thoughts on the matter. Steps for you... 1) if you are not aware of the topic, and arguments behind the proposition ----> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… 2) if you would like to read some feedback from the community, check this : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_… 3) to read the proposals : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… 4) to watch the youtube session : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3zlBGHHHiY 5) to take the survey as an individual : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_moveme… 6) to reflect with the group: here by email or there : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Offline_Projects/Mouvement_Brand_Project Thanks Anthere

4 8

How libzim and zimwriterfs handle the bigger than memory nature of Wikipedia dumps?
by Amirouche Boubekki 21 Jun '20

21 Jun '20

Hello, I am new to the mailing list. I used to work on sotoki. My question is somewhat related to my failed attempt to store stackoverflow dumps inside wiredtiger. Eventually, I figured that wiredtiger could not keep up with the write load and that it is a pain point at least with wiredtiger (but also with sqlite lsm extension). The workaround is to have as much as RAM as the data (which is in my opinion not acceptable), and fine-tune eviction triggers et al. My questions are about libzim, zimwriterfs and how full-text search is implemented: 1) Why zimwriterfs or libzim succeed at putting together all the html dumps of wikipedia? Is it because they're a lot of RAM? Or is it a particular algorithm? 2) Follow up question, how the full-text search is put together? Is the index written document by document then packed into the zim file? I am working on my free time on a search engine [1], my goal is to have my own search engine that I can use locally. That is why, I was thinking about kiwix, because kiwix via .zim files provide readily available dumps of many useful resources. The last question is: 3) how can I read the content of .zim from C code? Are there C bindings of libzim? Thanks! [0] It does not work anymore but the code is at https://github.com/amirouche/babelia

2 1

Fwd: Movement Strategy: transition to implementation begins
by Florence Devouard 10 Jun '20

10 Jun '20

Hello everyone, I hope all of you are safe. I am forwarding this email from Ryan from wikimedia-l, about the next steps of the implementation process of the Strategy. The team is looking for a set of diverse people to prepare the virtual transition discussions. The placeholder page on meta : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/2030 There is an office meeting with the Movement Strategy core team on Thursday. June 11 @ 08:00 UTC (Google Meet <http://meet.google.com/rva-yqaq-zdk>) [7] to share any comments and ask questions. I think that if you are interested in joining this group, attending the office meeting or getting in touch with a regional group might be a good idea. Florence -------- Message transféré -------- Sujet : [Wikimedia-l] Movement Strategy: transition to implementation begins Date : Tue, 9 Jun 2020 17:27:30 -0400 De : Ryan Merkley <rmerkley(a)wikimedia.org> Répondre à : Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> Pour : Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> Dear all, It’s my pleasure to be writing to you about the Movement Strategy. We have come together over the past 3 years to develop our Strategic Direction [1] and then the recommendations [2] to guide our collaborations and future. So many of you contributed to the process — some for only a part, and others throughout the entire process. With the recommendations complete, our focus now shifts to implementing the recommendations in a collaborative, open, and transparent way. Transition To make the transition from the publication of the recommendations to their implementation, we need to do some planning. It’s a 10-year strategy, with dozens of initiatives, dependencies, and connected goals, to be delivered in a more distributed, deliberative, and open collaborative model than ever before. We’ll need to work together to define how we prioritize, sequence, resource, and support each initiative. So much of our work is done online, but a lot of strategic work also happens in person. We can’t do that now, and so we’ve had to adapt to engage broadly, and in inclusive ways. To create this plan, movement-wide virtual events will kick off in September. We will use the Movement Strategy principles [3] as a guiding framework to ensure the planning will be inclusive and empowering for our diverse range of communities, without leaving anyone behind. As a result of the pandemic, we lost the chance to work together in-person on the transition to implementation at the Wikimedia Summit in Berlin [4]. Yet we gained an opportunity to include a higher number and a more diverse profile of participants. Engaging with online contributors, technical developer communities, and smaller user groups throughout the process will be a key priority. Successful virtual engagements with a high number of diverse participants are difficult to do well. Therefore, a Design Group will collaborate to prepare for the virtual transition discussions. This group will consist of community members reflecting different parts and perspectives of the movement, including representatives of regional collaboratives (CEE, ESEAP, Indaba, Iberocoop, North America, South Asia, WikiArabia, WikiFranca), the EDs and chairpersons groups, and WMF staff. Anyone who is interested can contribute. Regular summaries of the preparation work and design discussions will be published on meta so that anyone interested will be able to share insights and help improve the process, even if not part of the Design Group itself. Participation I look forward to: Working with many of you at the virtual transition events. Ways to participate and the schedule of events will be determined by the Design Group. The current plan is to start the virtual transition discussions with the movement in September. The virtual events is where major discussions will take place on sequencing, prioritizing, and resourcing the recommendations across the movement. Seeing those of you interested participate in the open review of the transition preparations. The task will be to review the work of the Design Group and share your perspective, enriching the thinking to improve the events. Open review will happen in parallel to the work of the Design Group from the end of June to the end of July / beginning of August. Having nominations from different movement groups and collaboratives (mentioned above) for the Design Group. The task will be to design as a group how the transition process of online events will be set up. Want to know more? We have put together a placeholder meta page [5] and will keep updating it as more information becomes available. Join office hours with the Movement Strategy core team on Wednesday. June 10 @ 17:00 UTC (Google Meet <http://meet.google.com/uun-pzmb-kti>) [6] or Thursday. June 11 @ 08:00 UTC (Google Meet <http://meet.google.com/rva-yqaq-zdk>) [7] to share any comments and ask questions. Our email channel is always open: strategy2030(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:strategy2030@wikimedia.org>. Best, Ryan Merkley Chief of Staff, Wikimedia Foundation [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017 <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017> [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recomme… <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recomme…> [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recomme… <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recomme…> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Summit_2020/Report <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Summit_2020/Report> [5] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/2030 <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/2030> [6] https://meet.google.com/uun-pzmb-kti <https://meet.google.com/uun-pzmb-kti>[7] https://meet.google.com/rva-yqaq-zdk <https://meet.google.com/rva-yqaq-zdk> _____________________________ Ryan Merkley (he/him) Chief of Staff, Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/> rmerkley(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:rmerkley@wikimedia.org> @ryanmerkley <https://twitter.com/ryanmerkley> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

3 3

Wikimedia Brand Project LIVE Unified Concept presentation Thursday 16 April from 1500 to 1600 UTC
by Florence Devouard 16 Apr '20

16 Apr '20

WMF Brand Project team will be holding the LIVE Unified Concept presentation Thursday 16 April from 1500 to 1600 UTC. You can join live on Youtube using this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q Join Snøhetta and the Brand Project team to review, celebrate, and conclude the first phase of the 2030 Movement Brand Project; with a unified “concept”. Listen in as Snøhetta explains how they used movement members' ideas, feedback and conceptual models to arrive at a final, unified concept. This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work around the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design system. This session will also be recorded and made available for viewing after. Please note: A concept is not a visible part of brand and design projects, but a guiding idea or spirit, summarized in one word. This is not a presentation of a proposal for a naming convention or design. The topic is currently discussed on wikimedia-l And a few additional links.... *https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project * https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_… Florence

1 0

Wikimedia Summit cancelled
by Florence Devouard 28 Feb '20

28 Feb '20

Dear all, It’s with regret that we have to inform you that due to the global health situation (COVID-19), the physical meeting of the Wikimedia Summit 2020 and related side events in Berlin have been cancelled. Since we currently look into hosting the Summit in a series of virtual meetings, starting at the dates of the Summit, please keep the dates blocked in your calendar. We are aware that this announcement will cause many questions (not only in relation to the Summit). Please be patient, more information will follow from our teams in the next few days. Best regards, Abraham Taherivand, Executive Director Wikimedia Deutschland Katherine Maher, Executive Director Wikimedia Foundation

1 0

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
70
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Offline-l