Ah, well that's not an external link, and thus unrelated to this thread! ;-)
On 13-10-31 02:13 PM, Jared Zimmerman wrote:
Quiddity,
I'm talking about something different, I'm talking about this
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Contributions_redesign.pdf the
url points to what appears to be a PDF but mediawiki(?) is displaying it
in a viewer/
*
*
*
*
*Jared Zimmerman *\\Director of User Experience \\Wikimedia Foundation
M : +1 415 609 4043 | : @JaredZimmerman <https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Quiddity <pandiculation(a)gmail.com
<mailto:pandiculation@gmail.com>> wrote:
PDFs:
1) That's a browser plugin. It works in Firefox, and possibly other
browsers, but not all. Eg. this PDF link opens in-browser in
Firefox, but not in Chromium:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/__Scrabble#cite_note-4
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrabble#cite_note-4>
2) Not all PDF links work even in Firefox, eg:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/__Scrabble#cite_note-12
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrabble#cite_note-12>
Deadlinks:
Very interesting. Thanks Nemo, for letting us know. I've added links
to that page at Enwiki, and viceversa.
On 13-10-31 01 <tel:13-10-31%2001>:55 PM, Jared Zimmerman wrote:
Conceptually I agrees, somewhat… but partly not. on wiki pdfs aren't
downloaded they're viewed on an in-page viewer, its basically
not a PDF
at that point, so i don't get the value of classifying the links
for them.
Broken links should be fixed, but in the case where they can't the
internet archive things sounds pretty interesting.
*
*
*
*
*Jared Zimmerman *\\Director of User Experience \\Wikimedia
Foundation
M : +1 415 609 4043 <tel:%2B1%20415%20609%204043> | :
@JaredZimmerman <https://twitter.com/__JaredZimmerman
<https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman>>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
<nemowiki(a)gmail.com <mailto:nemowiki@gmail.com>
<mailto:nemowiki@gmail.com <mailto:nemowiki@gmail.com>>> wrote:
Brion's email reminds me that we sometimes use an icon
resembling
Adobe's A to identify PDF, which is very ugly for an open
standard.
FSFE's initiative welcomes design help to make their icons
better,
their maintainer told me:
http://pdfreaders.org/____graphics.en.html
<http://pdfreaders.org/__graphics.en.html>
<http://pdfreaders.org/__graphics.en.html
<http://pdfreaders.org/graphics.en.html>>
Also, the Internet Archive brought up a proposal to "Create
a visual
format/style to include an archived link next to an
external link".
https://www.mediawiki.org/____wiki/Archived_Pages
<https://www.mediawiki.org/__wiki/Archived_Pages>
<https://www.mediawiki.org/__wiki/Archived_Pages
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Archived_Pages>>
Nemo
___________________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Design@lists.wikimedia.org>
<mailto:Design@lists.__wikimedia.org
<mailto:Design@lists.wikimedia.org>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/____mailman/listinfo/design
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/__mailman/listinfo/design>
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/__mailman/listinfo/design
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design>>
_________________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Design@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/__mailman/listinfo/design
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design>
_________________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Design@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/__mailman/listinfo/design
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design>
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design