On 01/08/2013 04:11 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
Note than "it's free and open sourced" is an important reason when we are "dedicated to encouraging the growth, development and distribution of free, multilingual content".
I agree. Being "viewable or playable by free software tools" is an important part of our value statement. However, in this case there's really no trade-off, since Arial-only users lose nothing.
It's Liberation Sans. We're not talking about a zero-sum choice, just about the order.
Is there a reason not to default to Liberation Sans and have Arial as secondary choice?
As I said, I'm fine with that, and I explained why I don't think it will cause problems in any of the scenarios we're considering (computer without Liberation Sans, computer without CSS, computer with both Liberation and Arial).
Matt Flaschen