That makes sense, as long as we don't keep suggesting the same articles I think its fine.
*Jared Zimmerman * \ Director of User Experience \ Wikimedia Foundation
M : +1 415 609 4043 | : @JaredZimmermanhttps://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Yuvi Panda yuvipanda@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jared Zimmerman < jared.zimmerman@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I thought Closer meant random+Geonearby
Heh, I was just randomly making names up. Was not initially planning on pushing this out wider than just May, but figured it'd be a good idea.
I'd recommend this isn't a button but a list—
In the app, these won't be buttons, but 'pull up' actions - bullet point #2 of https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia_App_Design#Page_1_:_Feed_me_more_kn... be exact.
For related we use the Meow method, then switch to the Linky Method when
the data exists. but always remove any pages that the user has seen this session (is that even possible?)
Makes sense. And yes, possible in the app.
Thoughts on the 'closer' method? It does tend to 'wander' less, but has an annoying tendency to keep going back to the ISBN article. Perhaps start with 'closer', but switch to linky when a duplicate is detected?
-- Yuvi Panda T http://yuvi.in/blog