Platonides; most php pages similar to surveys often screw up with php, the site *should* work with the back button but, many don't. I think the survey can but, I have not tested.
NOTE TO EVERYONE: Please don't tell me mistakes - if you look for a few seconds you could find at least 20 - I simply gave the link so you guys could simply see a *little* of how it will look and so in the future, you can look at it and it will evolve (slowly) - if you look in a week when I have a few questions, you will see an early short prototype.
thanx everyone for the help :)
deni + ipod
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Michael Bimmler" mbimmler@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:10 PM To: "Discussion list for the Communication Projects Group" comproj@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [ComProj] WIKIMEDIA CENSUS
On 11/6/07, Platonides platonides@gmail.com wrote:
symode09 wrote:
I have been very patient and have gone insane. Is there a SFTP client with a gui rather then having to type files? thanx
symode09 +itunes
In which OS are you? Assuming Windows, you should try out WinSCP3. I hope that by typing you don't mean manually copying the files to a shell...
If you have any problems.
On the survey, "Choose only one of the following" is superflous when you can only choose one. "If this is incorrect, please go back. Do not use your browser controlls, use the button inside the page." -> There's no back button in the page (and the web should be able to work with the browser back button).
What type of account on Wikiversity do you have? You can't have a Developer account on any WMF wiki.
In theory... Look e.g. at http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListusers&username=&...
Developers there are "Aoineko", "Hashar" and "Shaihulud"
On dewikipedia, it's Eloquence and Magnus Manske.
I agree that it is somewhat redundant to have these (they don't serve any purpose anymore, do they?) but they are still there...
Nor can you be steward per wiki (you are or not on the global WMF wikis). Nor can you AFAIK have Oversight other than in en: wikipedia (it's handled by stewards).
In Theory, yes. In practice there seems to be a bit of a mess On dewikipedia, Tim_Starling has oversight On frwikipedia, Anthere and Cary Bass have oversight Other projects, I didn't check.
Keeping it Standard User / Administrator / Bureaucrat sohould be enough. Only maybe having Checkuser.
Checkuser should be added, imho.
Michael
Platonides
ComProj mailing list ComProj@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj
ComProj mailing list ComProj@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj