That is what I meant, though in my mind I haven't completely ruled that idea out.
____________________
Mitch D. (Greeves on all English Wikimedia projects)
-----Original Message----- From: comproj-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:comproj-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Casey Brown Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 8:54 PM To: Discussion list for the Communication Projects Group Subject: Re: [ComProj] Logo
Looks really good! :-) I know we can use the logo, but I think Greeves was talking about how it would appear to outsiders if we used the logo. We don't want to look too official because we need to remind everyone that we aren't. :-)
On 9/3/07, Dan Collins en.wp.st47@gmail.com wrote:
I believe foundation policy states only that business cards may not be issued without consent, but the logo can be used freely. Attached is such a logo.
On 9/3/07, Mitchell mduce@mts.net wrote:
Right now, the logo on the project banner is the Wikipedia Contact Us logo. I don't think that our logo should include the Wikipedia logo unless we include the logos for other projects. Any thoughts on what a new logo could be? My first though was to do it like Wikimedia Chapters, (like the Wikimedia Foundation logo, but replacing "Foundation" with "Communication Projects Group" spaced out on two lines) but would that be seen as too official?
____________________
Mitch D. (Greeves on all English Wikimedia projects)
_______________________________________________ ComProj mailing list ComProj@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj