http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_not...

During/after one presentation in Haifa (Wikimania 2011) there was a talk about http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Overwriting_existing_files which one year after become guideline.

I'm happy about that, as that will hopefully solve a lot of problems.

But I remember when I started talking about problems on commons and inability to solve it in a way that will benefit the project, I was instructed to send a mail to the mailing list.

So I saw above complaint of pretty harsh passive-aggresive behaviour which spans almost a year (maybe more), and when finally user made complaint, everybody is looking another way and nobody reacts.

I'm just user on commons, I'm not an admin, but I'm asking is job of admin on commons only deleting copyvios (and there is an BLATANT copyvio) to which nobody reacted, and there is also blatant case of harrasment to which also nobody reacted.

I'm admin on another WIkimedia project and I know that user vs user bickering is sometimes better left to die of itself, but sometimes that is not the case.

If there is an report of copyvio somebody should react, or at least I think it should be so. Please tell me that I'm wrong and I'll shut up.

Kind regards

P.S. When harrasment complaint and copyvio complaint is moved to archive as nobody reacted for a 4 days after which MiszaBot archived it, I think something is not right. Either admins are not doing their job, or MiszaBot is too fast archiving topics which NEED be taken care of.

Please correct something, react to complains before MiszaBot archive it, or put bigger delay to MiszaBot. :)