Some of you may recall that about 5-6 (?) weeks ago we had a slew of deletion requests of beer bottles and cans. If my memory is correct, virtually all of them were "keep" under the rationale that the images didn't fall under fair use or copyright violations for our purposes. There is a fresh DR on this today:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Pacifico_l...
And another just closed as delete the other day. We have numerous images that are ostensibly just, well, images of products:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Marmite-Guinness_edition.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:A_bottle_of_Budweiser.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Stolichnaya.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Stoli.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ursuswodka.JPG
This isn't specific to alcohol products, of course--just went for those as they seem to be the topic of discussion. Should we be hosting such images?
- Joe
2008/9/19 Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com:
Some of you may recall that about 5-6 (?) weeks ago we had a slew of deletion requests of beer bottles and cans. If my memory is correct, virtually all of them were "keep" under the rationale that the images didn't fall under fair use or copyright violations for our purposes. There is a fresh DR on this today:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Pacifico_l...
And another just closed as delete the other day. We have numerous images that are ostensibly just, well, images of products:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Marmite-Guinness_edition.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:A_bottle_of_Budweiser.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Stolichnaya.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Stoli.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ursuswodka.JPG
This isn't specific to alcohol products, of course--just went for those as they seem to be the topic of discussion. Should we be hosting such images?
- Joe
Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc., 225 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2000) says sometimes.
Generally, these are straight copyvios and can be speedily deleted. There is no general defence to copyright infringement of a printed design that the design happens to appear on a can or a label.
See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/COM:CB#Product_packaging
Uncertainty can arise, though, where a design is old or is very similar to an old design (eg the Marmite jar).
Also
Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc., 225 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2000)
can sometimes come into play, though does not provide the worldwide permission to copy any label design that some would like.
What would help a lot is to have some well-defined way of recording against a kept image the copyright rationale under which it is being kept.
Michael
Joe Szilagyi wrote:
Some of you may recall that about 5-6 (?) weeks ago we had a slew of deletion requests of beer bottles and cans. If my memory is correct, virtually all of them were "keep" under the rationale that the images didn't fall under fair use or copyright violations for our purposes. There is a fresh DR on this today:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Pacifico_l...
And another just closed as delete the other day. We have numerous images that are ostensibly just, well, images of products:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Marmite-Guinness_edition.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:A_bottle_of_Budweiser.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Stolichnaya.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Stoli.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ursuswodka.JPG
This isn't specific to alcohol products, of course--just went for those as they seem to be the topic of discussion. Should we be hosting such images?
- Joe
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
Michael Maggs wrote:
Generally, these are straight copyvios and can be speedily deleted. There is no general defence to copyright infringement of a printed design that the design happens to appear on a can or a label.
See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/COM:CB#Product_packaging
Uncertainty can arise, though, where a design is old or is very similar to an old design (eg the Marmite jar).
Or for design that consists only of text, such as the brand name.
Ciao Henning
Quoting Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com:
Some of you may recall that about 5-6 (?) weeks ago we had a slew of deletion requests of beer bottles and cans. If my memory is correct, virtually all of them were "keep" under the rationale that the images didn't fall under fair use or copyright violations for our purposes. There is a fresh DR on this today:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Pacifico_l...
And another just closed as delete the other day. We have numerous images that are ostensibly just, well, images of products:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Marmite-Guinness_edition.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:A_bottle_of_Budweiser.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Stolichnaya.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Stoli.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ursuswodka.JPG
This isn't specific to alcohol products, of course--just went for those as they seem to be the topic of discussion. Should we be hosting such images?
When this was debated on the Village Pump last year Mike Godwin took what was to me to me a surprisingly laid back stance.
Asked this question:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MGodwin&diff=1474477...
... he gave this reply:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&diff...
Will
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
He's talking about images that "just happen" to include a copyright element, which is very different from, say, a can of beer where the shot has been taken expressly to show the printing all over the side.
Michael
When this was debated on the Village Pump last year Mike Godwin took what was to me to me a surprisingly laid back stance.
Asked this question:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MGodwin&diff=1474477...
... he gave this reply:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&diff...
Will
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
I would have said that, if it weren't for the very clear nature of the question he was asked. You are saying that he was asked one question, and answered a completely different one. Maybe we should ask him again.
Will
Quoting Michael Maggs Michael@Maggs.name:
He's talking about images that "just happen" to include a copyright element, which is very different from, say, a can of beer where the shot has been taken expressly to show the printing all over the side.
Michael
When this was debated on the Village Pump last year Mike Godwin took what
was to
me to me a surprisingly laid back stance.
Asked this question:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MGodwin&diff=1474477...
... he gave this reply:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&diff...
Will
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
On 9/19/08, Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com wrote:
Some of you may recall that about 5-6 (?) weeks ago we had a slew of deletion requests of beer bottles and cans.
I have a gut feeling "free as in beer (but bring your own mug)" won't be good enough.
—C.W.