On 11/08/06, Samuli Lintula <samuli(a)samulilintula.net> wrote:
Brianna Laugher:
"One way which might help a bit, would be to create a tag (possibly
invisible) that would trigger a notice on CTs that said, 'please delink
this image now or risk redlinks!'"
Me:
This already exists. From simple: "+VfD Conscious puts deletion marker
Duplicate on Image:IC_(400x).jpeg" and "+VfD Wikipeder puts deletion
marker Copyvio on Image:Hésiode.jpg". CommonsTickers should have
instructions on what to do in these cases. And some do:
Yes... I meant for images that are already marked for deletion, but
for some reason the projects haven't delinked it yet. This happens
more often than you might think. Weird.
Brianna Laugher:
"So on one hand we have local projects upset at us for deleting images in
use and on the other we have projects who seem not to even care when we
notify them. It is a difficult balance to walk."
Me:
On the third, the largest, hand we have projects that are just fine. I've
never heard a complaint from most of the wikis and not even from fi-wiki -
although they have had the opportunity. And do we have projects upset at
us, or just induhviduals from them?
Well, it is true that most projects are quite silent. Whether or not
they are happy, it is impossible to tell. I don't see a big
difference between having an individual and a project angry at us --
in that, if we can neutralise the individual's anger, we can possibly
stop them from spreading it inside their project. That would be a good
outcome, I think, rather than dismissing them and having them go and
find "backup support" :).
I actually find it very strange that
some users (like two ever) come to Commons to blame
the admins. They
should go yell at the person who uploaded an image or who took it in use
in a local project.
To some extent, yes. But many contributors, including image
contributors, are anonymous or fly-by-night. If someone hasn't edited
for 2 years, berating them's just not as satisfying as berating a
currently active user. ;)
If someone complains and we find out they were fair use/no source
images, they were warned, etc etc, then we will not apologise for
following our policies, which have good reasoning behind them and not
just a spirit of killjoy. And that has happened, I recall, a few
months ago on the Village pump. But equally, if someone complains and
their complaint is legitimate, our admins have made mistakes or acted
rashly etc etc, then I'm not going to defend us or our actions.
Both situations happen. We make mistakes and they make mistakes. We
can only do something about the former.
cheers,
Brianna