On 7 February 2010 13:27, Roan Kattouw roan.kattouw@gmail.com wrote:
There's no reason why it couldn't be the other way around: an intersection feature could be written and deployed *first*, *then* the category trees on Commons would be gradually migrated to the new system. Issues like nonsense results for automatic flattening could be migitated by disabling features or making them less visible.
*Precisely*. This is why the new (and it is new) demand to trash the present category tree before *possibly* implementing a category intersection feature is, in practical terms, indistinguishable from sheer contemptuous obstructionism. Daniel may be terribly offended that I dare to be acerbic about his expression of contempt, but I find his expression of contempt rather more offensive.
- d.