"Gregory Maxwell" gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote on Thu, 6 Sep 2007 17:09:18 -0400:
Most of the fields in information are common to virtually every image why should someone have to support 40 different ways of reading the same three or four basic pieces of information which are common to all images? Why should the same basic three or four fields have a different presentation randomly on some images?
It would be better to add lots of optional arguments to information.. or offer secondary additional information templates which have less uniformity but more flexibility.
That would surely be a way to get rid of/improve the louvre template or make it subst'able.
Regards,
Flo