Hi folks
Thanks very much for all this feedback. I do not understand the legal part of the discussion. But as a person who tries to get images from third parties non-acceptance of CC-3.0 is just another obstacle.
How shall an average website developer understand why we don't accept 3.0 licenses when CC notes on the 2.5 license that you should use the new (3.9) license for new works? It's hard enough to get a license that is not "for Wikipedia" only.
It sounds like a decision has been made. I uploaded a sample picture http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Nazareth_Christ_church_1.jpg
Will anybody fix the license template please?
Regards
Robin