geni wrote:
On 7/26/07, Andre Engels wrote:
I'm afraid it does not. I think including the picture doesn't make the ad CC-BY-SA; rather, it makes the ad a copyright violation.
One of the two yes.
Right.
Which one was it?
As I already sent to the list http://www.flickr.com/photos/babasu/289444685/ now has Cc-by-nc-sa. Much more incompatible if it wasn't changed after.