Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
How about the Free Art License (FAL)? http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/:
" All the elements of this work of art must remain free, which is why you are not allowed to integrate the originals (originals and subsequents) into another work which would not be subject to this license."
I don't really understand... does this mean that you can't show FAL work aside GFDL, or does it mean that derivative works are only allowed under the FAL? Curiously, the FAL does also not contain an aggregation clause.
Goes to show how bad an idea homebrewn or less scrutinized licenses are. The original language of the license at http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/ words it differently:
L' INTEGRATION DE L'OEUVRE. Toute intégration de cette oeuvre à un ensemble non soumis à la LAL doit assurer l'exercice des libertés conférées par cette licence.
Si l'oeuvre n'est plus accessible indépendamment de l'ensemble, alors l'intégration n'est possible qu'à condition que l'ensemble soit soumis à la LAL ou une licence compatible.
It specifically handles the weak copyleft case where the original work is integrated into the new work, though independent accessibility is ambiguous. When the license says it's subject to French law, does it also mean that the official language of the country should be used?