On 2/19/07, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 2/20/07, Pedro Sanchez pdsanchez@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a reason on why flckrlickr doesn't fill in the fields at {{flickreview}} template?
The template was invented only recently, and has been applied to FlickrLickr images even more recently. FlickrLickr images are reviewed & correctly licensed (they were all under CC-BY when my bot spidered them); CC licenses are not revocable. The justification here is that "Another look can't hurt"; I'm worried that it will cause Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. -- Peace & Love, Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
"An old, rigid civilization is reluctantly dying. Something new, open, free and exciting is waking up." -- Ming the Mechanic
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
Thanks, I was just wondering about the duplicity. I'll continue markign images as reviewed