interiot wrote: Okay, do individuals' deletion totals need to be made opt-in then?
Not sure - I would have thought that is uncritical, but Paddy's comments on Commons-l imply the opposite.
If I have a question about whether specific feature is okay, who is the best person to ask?
I think it would be a very good idea to ask the Foundation to develop a privacy guideline for MediaWiki and tool developers.
Does a user's total number of edits count as "intelligence that is not relevant to Wikipedia activity"?
Since several wikis have policies requiring a minimum number of edits to the main namespace, etc, it *is* relevant. OTOH, I'm a bit undecided if it's really OK to expose this information without asking.
Ideally, new users would be presented with a text explaining what data they expose when they contribute, and how this may be analyzed. This may even be made a click-through part of the account creation process.
Also ideally, users would be able to state which types of analysis they want to allow. Perhaps a simple scheme of "no statistics", "simple statistics" and "detailed statistics" would be enough, with a default of "simple". "Simple" statistics would basically be total counts (number of edits, maybe per namespace, number of deletions, etc), "detailed" would be "anything goes". A per-project policy could then require admins to at least allow simple statistics, or something like that.
I'm not sure if this would be feasible and/or legally sound. I'm just brainstorming here.
-- Daniel
PS: sorry for cross-posting again. I guess this discussion should be moved to the foundation list or something.