Hoi, Using loss less audio is particularly relevant for the recordings of pronunciations. For ordinary use having them compressed in a lossy way is not a problem. The point is that with the Shtooka software that became available, we are in a position to easily create large amounts of sound files. These are of relevance to scientists and they have a need for loss less files. Given that the only identified reason to have loss less soundfiles ARE the pronunciations, the current upload size would suffice. They are in effect single words at most a sentence.
Thanks, GerardM
Edward Z. Yang schreef:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
What I'd like to see us do instead, is to ask uploaders to send us losslessly compressed Ogg/Flac files instead. Lossless compression because disk space isn't totally irrelevant and to avoid people downloading insanely huge wavs just because they don't want to use the java player or install a codec. We already permit uploading these lossless audio files they can be easily transcoded to Ogg/Vorbis while preserving all metadata. [snip]
I think this is a great idea and should definitely be investigated. However:
- Encoding audio in a lossless codec seems, at least from my
experience, to be a very CPU intensive process. WIth our equipment, this may or may not be a problem.
- If we encourage losslessly compressed audio, we will probably want to
increase our maximum upload size. Longer audio clips will easily exceed 20 MB, and Spoken Wikipedia usually *must* split up their audio files in order to upload them in (whether for better or worse). This also runs up with some of HTTPs limitations when it comes to file uploads. An anonymous FTP server would be pretty neat, but I doubt it's going to happen.