On 7/14/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/14/07, Samuli Lintula samuli@samulilintula.net wrote:
BTW, why is it that requiring attribution (an inelianable moral right) is considered free while requiring other inalienable moral rights is unfree?
Because it doesn't really place restictions on what you can do with the work
I believe you are completely mistaken. The way *i* understand it, the CC 3.0 licence simply states clearly in the text of the licence rights that exist and can't be waived in those countries where they exist anyway.
In clear, the licence does not *add* any restriction that is not there in the first place.
Delphine