On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:57 PM, geni wrote:
On 06/11/2007, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/11/2007, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
Because of some rather legalistic interpretations of the policy, the template you applied to the image which has *all appearances of a rationale* and which probably says exactly what you would say for a rationale if you spent a long time thinking about it .... isn't actually considered a rationale.
I sometimes wonder if this is an elaborate trick to put people off using non-free images, simply by making it such a hassle that it's not worth their time...
No it's to make you think and hopefully show that on some level you understand what you are doing. -- geni
Well, I read the template which seemed to be a pretty legitimate fair use argument. Clearly I misunderstood the process, but I would like to assert that I did "think" and that "on some level" understood what I was doing on the copyright level... but you're welcome to disagree. :-p
-- My Blog - http://joi.ito.com/ My Photos - http://www.flickr.com/photos/joi/ Facebook Profile - http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=505656997 LinkedIn Profile - http://www.linkedin.com/profile?key=1391